Construction, Property & Real Estate - Case Law Review (March 2007).
Mondaq Business Briefing › Nbr. 2007, January 2007
Linked as:
Extract
Construction, Property & Real Estate - Case Law Review (March 2007).
ADJUDICATION
See Quietfield v Vascroft Contractors under Keating Chambers Reported Cases on failure to consider new evidence in subsequent adjudication. Time limits for referral Hart Investments Ltd v Fidler [2007] 109 Con LR 67 TCC, [2007] TCLR 1 and [2007] BLR 30. Already reported in CILL and noted in KC in Brief January 2007. The TCC held invalid a referral notice served eight, rather than seven, days after the notice of intention to refer under paragraph 7 of the Scheme for Construction Contracts. This decision departs somewhat from statements in English cases such as Barnes & Elliott v Taylor Woodrow and Simons v Aardvark (Paul Darling QC) in favour of the stricter approach to time limits of Scottish cases such as Ritchie Bros v Philp. See now also Epping Electrical v Briggs & Forrester (David Thomas QC). Natural justice Natural justice: further developments by Dominic Helps and Peter Sheridan, Shadbolts. Construction Law Journal [2007] Vol.23 No.1 p.46 In their regular Construction Act Review, the authors return to the subject they addressed two years ago in Construction Law Journal [2005] Vol.21 No.2. They comment extensively on Carillion Construction v Devonport Royal Dockyard (Stephen Furst QC and Louise Randall) and include fairly detailed consideration of All in One Building v Makers UK (Calum Lamont), Quietfield v Vascroft (Abdul Jinadu and Matthew Holt), Kier Regional v City & General (Adrian Williamson), R...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
