Supreme Court Allows Disparate Impact Claims Under ADEA.
Mondaq Business Briefing › Nbr. 2005, January 2005
Linked as:
Mondaq Business Briefing › Nbr. 2005, January 2005
Linked as:Extract
Supreme Court Allows Disparate Impact Claims Under ADEA.
In a surprise ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court decided on March 30, 2005 that a claimant may establish liability under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) even if there is no intent to discriminate. Smith v. City of Jackso...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Florida Tile v. N.L.R.B. **, 946 F.2d 1547 (11th Cir. 1991) | d & g stout incorporated formerly known as general liquors incorporated plaintiff-appellant v bacardi imports incorporated defendant-appellee. ... | Becton Dickinson and Company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.R. Bard, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.,... | Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,641, 12 Ucc Rep.Serv.2D 813 in Re Melvin G. Heide and M. Larayne Heide, Husband and Wife, Debtors. Stimson Bullitt, Trustee in B... | sentencia nº 20853 de corte de apelaciones de puerto montt sala segunda october 14 2011 | Resolución nº 140895 de Corte de Apelaciones de Santiago Sala Tercera September 24 2001 | Sentencia nº 154 de Consiglio di Stato, May 13, 2010 | resolución nº 127633, de corte de apelaciones de santiago - sala tercera, october 26, 2007