Three California Supreme Court Decisions: Not All Good News.
Mondaq Business Briefing › Nbr. 2005, January 2005
Linked as:
Mondaq Business Briefing › Nbr. 2005, January 2005
Linked as:Extract
Three California Supreme Court Decisions: Not All Good News.
Miller v. Department of Corrections -- Sexual favoritism can lead to liability
On July 18, 2005, the California Supreme Court entered its decision in the case entitled Miller v. Department of Corrections (2005) 36 Cal.4th 446. The decision significantly expands potential employer liability for sexual harassment claims. In short, employees in California may now sue employers for sexual harassment if a sexual affair between a supervisor and a subordinate creates a hostile work environment for employees not involved in the affair. Two employees, Edna Miller and Frances Mackey, sued the Department of Corrections under the FEHA for, among other things, sexual harassment, sexual discrimination, and retaliation. Plaintiffs' claims stemmed from their tenure under Lewis Kuykendall, who served as the chief deputy warden at the first prison facility where plaintiffs were employed, and later as the warden at ...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Medsoft Teams Up With Seagate Software; Crystal Reports bundled in Optimizer 8.0 practice management system. | Plant-Wide Research Group upgrades expands advisory services. | CanWest s First Quarter Operating Profit Up 21 Percent Revenue Increases 12 Percent. | corrections. | sentencia nº 2715 de consiglio di stato june 01 2009 | Sentencia nº 2962 de Consiglio di Stato June 03 2008 | Sentencia nº 5005 de Consiglio di Stato September 23 2008 | Sentencia nº 319 de Consiglio di Stato, September 17, 2010